An Agreement Which Is Free From Any Defect Is

There are different opinions in the doctrine on the legal nature of discretionary rights that are legally due to the purchaser. The question that leads to discrepancies in the doctrine is whether the buyer`s optional right, in particular his right to revoke the contract, is a determining right or a claim that arises with the consensus of the parties. Although the majority of them, on this particular subject, consider that optional rights are determining rights, so that they can be used by unilateral letter of intent to the seller, other opinions in the doctrine argue that it is necessary to have the consensus of the parties on the optional right that the purchaser will exercise. While these discretionary rights were exercised only by the courts under the old Turkish code of obligation number 818, the TCO ruled out this problem and paved the way for swift action. If the loss of the thing sold is very close to the purchase price, the buyer can only exercise his right to revoke the contract or to demand replacement delivery by a new one, without error. o) « guarantee » an agreement on goods subject to a sale contract, but guarantees for the main purpose of such a contract, the violation of which creates a right to reparation, but not the right to refuse the goods and to consider the contract as rejected. R.S., about 408, see 2. (a) these statutes or legal provisions in amended, consolidated and/or reassessed statutes or legal provisions from time to time; and the right to replace the defective goods, which is another optional right to the purchaser under section 227 TCO, is exercised only for general obligations. Given the obligations that relate to a particular point, the exercise of that right can only be exercised if the parties agree to this issue. While Section 227 TCO allows the buyer to benefit from this right, it also has the right to prevent the seller from preventing the buyer from exercising his optional rights by immediately repaying the same thing sold without default and compensating the buyer for any damage he has suffered. (3) When the seller, through a sales contract, claims to be carrying out a current sale of future goods, the contract acts as a contract for the sale of the goods. R.S., about 408, 8. Because of the aforementioned controversies of the submissions in the doctrine, the sales contract is revoked retroactively, sometimes by the buyer`s unilateral letter of intent and sometimes by the mutual consent of the parties or, in some cases, by the judge`s decision to dismiss.

Therefore, the return of executions carried out in the event of the revocation of the contract is necessary. 12 (1) If there is an agreement to sell property on the terms that the price must be set by the valuation of a third party and that third party cannot or cannot make such an assessment, the agreement is avoided, provided that the goods or part of it have been delivered to the buyer and that it has been acquired by the buyer, must pay a reasonable price. The obligations imposed on the buyer consist (i) of verifying the thing sold and (ii) informing the seller of the alleged defects. The buyer must review the purchase and, in case of defects, he is required to inform the seller as far as. However, according to a recent opinion published in the doctrine, these consumers should have the opportunity to claim damages and make other claims in accordance with the general provisions of Section 112 tCO, since these obligations could impose undue liability on non-merchant buyers. (2) Is there a contract to sell goods; the purchaser neglects or refuses to take or pay one or more payments, depending on the terms of the contract and the circumstances of the case, whether the infringement is a refusal of the entire contract or whether it is a dissociable offence, a right to reparation, but not a right to reject the entire contract.

Les commentaires pour cet article sont fermés.